Law v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam: This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Saul Bicbard Gramer with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Buie 134(h). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on April 16, 1971, wherein he concluded “that defendant has failed to meet the burden of proof * * * that plaintiff * * * ‘corruptly’ practiced or attempted ‘to practice any fraud against the United States in the proof, statement, establishment, or allowance’ of the claim herein” and recommended that judgment be entered for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Loesch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.