Legal Opinion

Loesch v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 11, 1981No. 240-75; No. 430-75; No. 435-75; No. 1-76; No. 111-76; No. 307-77PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated cases come before the court on plaintiffs’ exceptions to the recommended decision (including an opinion, findings of fact, and conclusions of law) filed by Trial Judge Thomas J. Lydon.

The court hereby adopts the trial judge’s findings and opinion as the basis for its judgment in the case. The findings, however, are not printed herein since his opinion sets forth the facts necessary for an understanding of the decision.

Therefore, the court concludes as a matter of law that plaintiffs are not entitled to recover, and their petitions are hereby dismissed.

*36OPINION OF THE TRIAL…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Reid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Vera Rogers Jones, the Estate of Ada Rogers Graham, and the Estate of Hattie Davis Rogers v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bennett v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District No. OneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API