Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Rossini

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 11, 1971No. 2 CA-CIV 889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Rossini, plaintiffs in the trial court, filed a complaint naming State Farm and one Darlene Dixon, as defendants. Two claims were asserted: (1) Against Dixon for damages incurred as the result of her alleged negligence in operating a motor vehicle which resulted in injury to the plaintiff-husband, and (2) Against State Farm for breach of contract, i. e., refusal to pay coverage benefits of a •policy issued by it to the plaintiff-husband. State Farm filed a responsive pleading to •Count Two, alleging inter alia that the plaintiff had executed fair and binding…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Schecter v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Southwestern Fire and Casualty Company v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Transportation Insurance Company v. WadeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kisling v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. RomanTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. BensonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Payne v. Pennzoil Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API