Legal Opinion
Charles Hill v. United States Department of Labor Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1995No. 94-3641PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether the limitations period contained in a federal remedial statute should have been equitably tolled. The petitioners are employees of a company that contracted to provide services to a federal agency and whose contract was terminated for reasons the petitioners contend violated a federal statute. The Secretary of Labor found that the petitioners filed their administrative complaint after the applicable statute of limitations had expired and dismissed the complaint. The petitioners appeal, arguing that fraudulent concealment by the agency…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Fahrner v. SW Manufacturing, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Diamond Time, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Egerer v. Woodland Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- GREGORY C. SASSÉ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICECourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.