Legal Opinion
Allen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1926No. 25,117PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDebele, J.
Action on a policy of fire insurance. The court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
Henry Aigner was the owner of a farm mortgaged to the plaintiff. In the mortgage he and his wife covenanted:
“At their own expense to keep the buildings on said premises at all times insured in some reliable stock insurance company or companies, to be approved by the party of the second part, his heirs or assigns, for at least the sum of $2,000, payable in case of loss to said party of the second part to the amount then secured by this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. OlcottIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. BohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Citizens State Bank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- H. F. Shepherdson Co. v. Central Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Security Union Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- American National Bank & Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.