Legal Opinion

Sugarcreek Township v. City of Centerville

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 2009No. 2009-CA-27PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the city of Centerville, appeals from a declaratory judgment of the trial court, which holds that plaintiff-appellee, Sugarcreek Township, is entitled to all real property taxes to be collected from two parcels of land annexed by Centerville. The trial court also held that Centerville violated Sugarcreek’s rights under R.C. 709.023(H) by entering into a preannexation agreement to enact a tax-increment financing (“TIF”) plan for the annexed parcels.

{¶ 2} Centerville contends that the trial court erred in finding that Sugarcreek has standing to enforce the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Smith v. Five Rivers MetroparksOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Elyria Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sugarcreek Township v. City of CentervilleOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Fifth Third Mtge. Co. v. BihnOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. McDonald's Corp. v. Union Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Sugarcreek Township v. City of CentervilleOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Cornell v. Greene Cty. Bd. Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API