Legal Opinion

Smith v. Five Rivers Metroparks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1999No. C.A. Case No. 17744. T.C. Case No. 98-2474PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Christopher Smith, appeals from a summary judgment rendered against him, and in favor of defendants-appellees, Five Rivers Metro-Parks and Captain Larry Jones, with respect to Smith’s complaint, charging MetroParks and Jones with race discrimination, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and R.C. 4112.99, and with violating his equal protection, and substantive and procedural due process rights, pursuant to Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code. Smith argues that the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment, because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Williams v. McFarland Properties, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Slowey v. Midland Acres, Ca2007-08-030 (6-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Care Risk Retention Group v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Harvey v. Sys. Effect, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Winner Bros. v. Seitz Electric, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API