Legal Opinion

Sugarcreek Township v. City of Centerville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2012No. 2011-0926PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This case involves the interplay between a municipality’s so-called expedited type-2 annexation of real property located within a township pursuant to R.C. 709.023 and the municipality’s tax-increment financing (“TIF”) created pursuant to R.C. 5709.40 to encourage development of that property. We hold that although a township continues to receive tax revenue on property that a municipality annexes through an expedited type-2 process under R.C. 709.023, the municipality may adopt a TIF plan under R.C. 5709.40 that temporarily exempts from city and township property taxes a portion of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Savarese v. Buckeye Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Burrows v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Middletown v. McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Obetz v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Kohl's Illinois, Inc. v. Marion Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Dalton v. Ohio Dept. Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. St. Clair Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Hamilton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State ex rel. Xenia v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API