Legal Opinion
Modern Settings, Inc. v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1984No. 83 Civ. 6291 (RLC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
The main issue before the court is whether plaintiffs have stated with the requisite particularity, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 9(b), various counts of fraud with which they charge defendants. Plaintiffs, Modern Settings, Inc. and Binder & Binder, their attorneys in the transactions at issue, allege that defendants Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc., individual managers and a representative of the firm, 1 Prudential-Bache Metal Co., Inc. and its president have violated section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), section 4(b) of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Melanie Geisler v. Orlando R. Petrocelli and Pinnacle Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Richard Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Susan R. Wexner v. First Manhattan Co., John R. Loomis and Joseph Stein, Jr., Individually and as Co-Partners of First Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Boley v. Pineloch Associates, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Bozsi Ltd. Partnership v. LynottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Ades v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Modern Settings, Inc. v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.