Legal Opinion

Luedtke v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2005No. 04-144PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Thomas H. Luedtke appeals his felony convictions for forgery and attempting to obtain possession of a controlled substance by prescription fraud. Mr. Luedtke contends that the district court improperly permitted a witness, not on the State’s original witness list, to testify and erred when it supplied the jury with a supplemental instruction during deliberations. Mr. Luedtke also challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for new trial. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Mr. Luedtke states the issues as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred in permitting the testimony of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Broom v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hannon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Ogden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bromley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Snow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API