Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Larkin

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1985No. 3-83 Civ. 1340PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSOP, District Judge.

The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned on the 14th day of December, 1984, upon the motion of defendant Terry Larkin to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and upon the motion of defendant Anthony Bouza for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Since matters outside of the pleadings have been presented to and accepted by the court, both motions shall be considered as motions for summary judgment.

The incident out of which this case arises took place shortly…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crystal Pickrel v. City of Springfield, Illinois, David Dyer, and McGraw Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Greco v. GussCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Evonne J. New v. City of Minneapolis, Alva Emerson and William ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re Scott County Master DocketDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  5. Cook v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API