Legal Opinion
In Re Scott County Master Docket
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 2, 1985No. Civ. 3-85-774, 4-84-1066, 4-84-1214, 4-84-1230, 3-84-1615, 3-85-138, 3-85-336, 3-85-337 and 3-85-506PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Virtually all of the defendants in the eight above captioned cases (hereafter Scott County cases) moved for dismissal and/or summary judgment. The Court heard these motions early in the litigation, either prior to or shortly after the commencement of discovery depositions. The Court quickly announced its rulings in terse orders to enable successfully moving defendants to avoid the burdens of discovery. This Memorandum Opinion sets forth the rationale for those rulings, but it does not deal with Gould v. County of Scott (CIVIL 3-85-506). The…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Greg Myers, Etc. v. R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Murray v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Collins on Behalf of Collins v. TabetNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens & Associates Engineers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Scott County Master DocketDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.