Inhabitants of Leominster v. Conant
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.
This is a writ of entry in which the demandant seeks to recover certain premises, which were sold by the collector of taxes of Leominster for the non-payment of an assessment laid thereon by the selectmen of Leominster for the construction of a sewer. The demandant’s title depends upon the validity of this assessment, and of the proceedings had to enforce the same.
While no particular form of words is made necessary by the statute to be used by the authorities in laying out a sewer, yet *385there must be such a laying out before any assessment therefor can be made; and this must be done with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Cabell v. Cabell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Bennett v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Halleck v. Inhabitants of BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Allen v. City of CharlestownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sears v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.