Legal Opinion

Carr v. Dooley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1876PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The first count in the plaintiff’s declaration is upon the covenant against incumbrances contained in the defendant’s deed to him. It alleges that the plaintiff has been obliged to pay an assessment for a sewer, which was a lien on the estate when the deed was made. The deed is dated June 8, 1870. The sewer was constructed under the provisions of the St. of 1869, c. 111, in pursuance of a resolution of the mayor and aider-men passed in May previous, directing “ that a common sewer be laid in Cedar Street, from the Crosby Street sewer to Keene Street; the size of the sewer to be twelve inches…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Bennett v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Blackie v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Cochran v. GuildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Prince v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Pybus v. GrassoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Irvine v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Graffam v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API