Legal Opinion

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. French

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1900PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — lion. J. H. Slover, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court · GanttGantt, C. J.

This suit was instituted in the circuit court of Jackson county, returnable to the October term (1899) thereof, for the purpose of enforcing the lien of a tax-bill issued by Kansas City in part payment of the cost of paving Eorest avenue from Independence avenue to Twelfth street with an asph'alt pavement. The petition is in the usual form.

The defense relied upon by the defendants, although stated in several different forms, may be resolved .into two contentions: First, that the requirement of the ordinance and contract providing for the work in respect to the guarantee thereof for five years…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Peckham.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Meier v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Anderson v. City of OcalaSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. King v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Heman v. GilliamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API