Legal Opinion

Gallop v. Rose

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1992No. 3163PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

This appeal has been taken from the judgment in the amount of $15,000.00 entered in favor of appellant, Linda Gallop, after the court molded a jury verdict in the amount of $100,000.00 in favor of Linda Gallop, by reducing it by $85,-000.00, representing the amount of uninsured motorist benefits already paid to appellant. We affirm the verdict as molded by the trial court.

Appellant recites in her brief the factual history of the accident which underlies this litigation and appeal:

On November 18, 1984, plaintiff Linda Gallop was a passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Iorfida v. Mary Robert Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Walls v. City of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Maurine Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DiTomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Professional Flooring Co. v. Bushar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Pusl v. MeansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Hillworth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Shankweiler v. Regan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API