Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DiTomo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1984No. 1534PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an Order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant, Douglas DiTomo, and denying appellant plaintiff, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

DiTomo, while operating his motorcycle was involved in an accident with an automobile driven by Sylvester Anderson. Anderson was insured by Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO). Pursuant to its policy with Anderson, GEICO paid its policy limits of $20,000 to DiTo-mo. Subsequently, DiTomo, made claim against Nation wide, his parents’ insurer, for uninsured motorists benefits.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Rita S. White, and Allstate Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mowery v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Gallop v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Pusl v. MeansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Shankweiler v. Regan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API