Legal Opinion

Hillworth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1993No. 1818PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from an order dated April 13, 1992, granting appellee Daniel A. Smith’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant, Robin E. Hillworth, presents one issue for our review.

Did the [appellee] demonstrate by the pleading, depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, or admissions of record that no genuine issue of material fact existed so as to entitle him to summary judgment as a matter of law which judgment would result in dismissal of [appellant’s] complaint which sought to recover the amount of underinsured motorist protection afforded to [appellant] by her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Paxton National Insurance v. BrickajlikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Holmes v. LadoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Rohm & Haas Co. v. LessnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allied Electrical Supply Co. v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Green v. Daimler BenzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Allied Electrical Supply Co. v. Roberts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API