Legal Opinion
Kleiner v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 28, 1984No. Civ. C80-921, C81-1553PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge.
These consolidated cases are before the court on the Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their claims that the Bank breached its obligation to them by not charging interest on their loans in the manner set in the notes signed by Plaintiffs. 1 After consideration, the court finds that the record does not establish as a matter of law that the Bank breached an obligation to Plaintiffs or that Plaintiffs are otherwise entitled to recover. Therefore, the motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED.
The court has certified three plaintiff classes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rodolitz v. Neptune Paper Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kleiner v. First National Bank of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Patton v. Bank of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Rodolitz v. Neptune Paper Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haroco, Incorporated, Roman Ceramics, Incorporated, California Originals, Incorporated v. American National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Mars Steel Corporation v. Continental Illinois National Bank And Trust Company Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Turner Entertainment Co. v. Degeto Film GmbHCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Flint Davis v. Sears, Roebuck and Company and Bruce MasonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.