Sweasey v. Sweasey
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. G. W. Hunter, Judge. The judgment appealed from, by its terms, expressly continued in force an order allowing temporary alimony in the sum of thirty dollars per month, “until the further order of this court, so that in the event of an appeal being taken, said allowance will be paid during the pendency of said cause on appeal.” Further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
—The parties are husband and wife, and the action was brought by the wife to secure a separate maintenance under section 137 of the Civil Code, charging desertion on the part of the husband.
The defendant in his answer denied the alleged desertion, and also filed a cross-complaint, in which he asked for a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. ’ A great many acts on the part of plaintiff are specifically alleged, consisting mostly of false and slanderous charges with reference to him, well calculated, if believed, to degrade him in the community, and of filthy and obscene language addressed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conant v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by12 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Mattson v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Broad v. BroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- In Re Marriage of SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.