Legal Opinion
Albany Molecular Research, Inc. v. Schloemer
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 14, 2011No. Misc. No. 2011-0096PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is a Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena filed by PGxHealth, LLC (“PGxHealth”) and defendant George C. Schloemer. The motion requests that the Court quash plaintiff Albany Molecular Research, Inc.’s (“AMRI”) subpoena to the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to produce “(1) the application submitted by PGxHealth for Vilazodone; (2) the FDA’s application file for Vilazodone, and (3) correspondence or notes, whether in paper or electronic format, of meetings between the FDA and PGxHealth concerning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- DL v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Echostar Communications Corp. v. News Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In Re Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena Directed to the United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025