Legal Opinion
Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 25, 2002No. Civ.A. 00876-RRM(SLR)(MPT)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Under consideration is nonparty Congoleum’s, motion to quash the subpoena for documents issued by plaintiff, Mannington Mills (Mannington). Mannington served the extensive subpoena to obtain various documents from Congoleum relating to any and all contacts, discussions, understandings or agreements, whether written or oral, between Congoleum and defendant, Armstrong and Domco Tarkett (plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action against Mannington) and all of Congoleum’s financial information relating to sales, market share, net profits/gross revenue,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cmedia, LLC v. LifeKey Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- First Sealord Surety v. Durkin & Devries Insurance AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Itochu International, Inc. v. Devon Robotics, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.