Legal Opinion
Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 2014No. 11-cv-1266 (SAS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This suit arises out of the death of Daniel Wultz and' the injuries of Yekutiel Wultz, suffered in a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv, Israel. Four members of the Wultz family brought suit against Bank of China (“BOC”), alleging acts of international terrorism under the Antiterrorism Act (“ATA”),1 among other claims.
All of Plaintiffs’ non-federal claims against BOC have been dismissed.2 In addition, Plaintiffs’ attempt to hold BOC liable for aiding and abetting international terrorism under the ATA has been categorically…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cynthia King v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Samantar v. YousufSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moriah v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Moriah v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ben-Haim v. EdriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chang v. Republic of South SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.