Legal Opinion

Averill v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 2010No. 62767-8-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 Farmers appeals the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Averill and denial of Farmers’ CR 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Farmers paid its insured, Averill, for the loss of her automobile in an accident, then sought recovery of its subrogated interests in arbitration with the other driver’s insurer. Farmers also sought recovery of Averill’s deductible on her behalf. The arbitrator determined that each party was 50 percent at fault and awarded Farmers and Averill each 50 percent of the amount claimed. Averill sued Farmers to recover the other 50 percent of her deductible on the theory…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Daniels v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Humleker v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Lauri Daniels v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API