Legal Opinion

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Lee

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 17, 1980PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

In a case novel in this jurisdiction as a challenge to the power vested by our Constitution 2 in the Supreme Judicial Court as one of the three co-equal branches of government, an attorney, Freddie F. Lee, disputes the right of the Supreme Judicial Court by promulgation of the Maine Bar Rules to require every attorney in active practice in our state to pay an annual registration fee to the Board of Overseers of the Bar created thereunder. 3

The facts of the case are uncontroverted. In 1979 Lee filed a registration statement with the Board, “under protest” as he said, but…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Beard v. North Carolina State BarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Matter of BenoitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API