Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Shamo

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 25, 2000No. 99-73532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The above-captioned action is presently before the Court on Defendant John Sha-mo’s July 12, 2000 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s June 29, 2000 bench ruling denying his motion to dismiss. Having reviewed and considered Defendant’s Motion, Brief and supporting documents, the Court has determined that Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration should be granted and this case should, accordingly, be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. MetzDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  3. Orta v. ReppDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API