Legal Opinion
Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 6, 2004No. Bankruptcy No. 98-02632-6W7, Adversary No. 01-170PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
THIS PROCEEDING came on for consideration on the following motions to quash the three subpoenas (“Subpoenas”), which were caused to be issued on or about December 23, 2003, by one of the defendants, Robert Daniels a/k/a Robert Dizak (“Daniels”), to three individuals— Sean Concannon, Yvonne Shepherd, and Cheryl Thompson — requiring them to appear at depositions: (1) Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Sanctions (Doc. No. 245) filed by Sean Concannon; and (2) Emergency Motion of Bankruptcy…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. CabreraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Anderson v. DemarestDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Jeffrey W. Holton v. Nicholas A. Sudzina, Kimberly Jenkins, Stephanie Sullivan, John Does 1-X (General Counsel), John Does Y-Z (IT Department)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- LYON K. MAKAVER v. JUDGE SCOTT MARCUS BERNSTEIN, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.