Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Mueller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2006No. 127 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Based on the following, the decision and order of the Superior Court, Kelly v. Mueller, 861 A.2d 984 (Pa.Super.2004), is hereby VACATED, as the court decided an issue of substance not properly preserved for review; namely, whether the Protection from Abuse Act, 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 6101, et seq. (PFA Act), authorizes courts to order search and seizure without offending the protections of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 8, of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Further, the Order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas dated October 14, 2003 is…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Kelly v. MuellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Law Office of Douglas T. Harris v. Philadelphia Waterfront Partners, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Stamus v. DutcavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Dietrich v. DietrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. B.T.W. ex rel. T.L. v. P.J.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API