Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schofield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2005No. 41 EAP 2004PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted review of this case, Commonwealth v. Schofield, 580 Pa. 4, 858 A.2d 1157 (2004), consolidated it with our review of Commonwealth v. Castillo, 580 Pa. 3, 858 A.2d 1156 (2004), and directed the parties to address the following issue:

Should this Court reconsider its decisions in Commonwealth v. Lord, 553 Pa. 415, 719 A.2d 306 (1998), and Commonwealth v. Butler, 571 Pa. 441, 812 A.2d 631 (2002), so as to allow discretion in the intermediate appellate courts to review an issue that was not raised in a timely statement of matters complained of on appeal under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Greater Erie Industrial Development Corp. v. Presque Isle Downs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In re L.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. HartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. WholaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API