Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Mueller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 In this extraordinary case, appellants, James C. Mueller, Sr. (father) and James C. Mueller, Jr. (son) appeal from an Order and Supplemental Order entered under the Protection from Abuse (PFA) Act. 23 Pa.C.S. § 6101, et seq. The Muel-*988lers contend the trial court abused its discretion and exceeded its authority by ordering the search of their residence and father’s hunting cabin, and the seizure of son’s weapons and father’s handgun. In its Opinion pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a), the trial court declined to address the appropriateness of its Orders and simply asserts…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PadillaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Stamus v. DutcavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Kelley v. MuellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Lanza v. SimconisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Urbanek v. Nolan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API