Kelly v. Mueller
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
TAMILIA, J.:
¶ 1 In this extraordinary case, appellants, James C. Mueller, Sr. (father) and James C. Mueller, Jr. (son) appeal from an Order and Supplemental Order entered under the Protection from Abuse (PFA) Act. 23 Pa.C.S. § 6101, et seq. The Muel-*988lers contend the trial court abused its discretion and exceeded its authority by ordering the search of their residence and father’s hunting cabin, and the seizure of son’s weapons and father’s handgun. In its Opinion pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a), the trial court declined to address the appropriateness of its Orders and simply asserts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PadillaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Stamus v. DutcavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Kelley v. MuellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Lanza v. SimconisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Urbanek v. Nolan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County2008