Legal Opinion
Casserlie v. Shell Oil Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 2009No. 2007-1408PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
I
{¶ 1} Appellants’ proposition of law proposes that “[t]he definition of Good Faith under the [Uniform Commercial Code] incorporating an ‘honesty in fact’ component requires a subjective inquiry.” We disagree and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
II
{¶ 2} Appellants, Donald Casserlie and others, are a group of independent Shell lessee-dealers in the greater Cleveland area (collectively, “the dealers”). The appellees in this case are Shell Oil Company, its partners, and its successors (collectively, “Shell”), who at various times between 1995 and the time the complaint was filed sold…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Havird Oil Company, Incorporated v. Marathon Oil Company, Incorporated, and Emro Marketing Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Putnam Rolling Ladder Co. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wells Fargo v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- DiPasquale v. CostasOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Paul Cheatham I.R.A. v. Huntington Natl. Bank (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Two Bros. Distributing Inc. v. Valero Marketing & Supply Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Autry Petroleum Co. v. BP Products North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.