Legal Opinion

DiPasquale v. Costas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2010No. 23436PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, James Costas, D.D.S., Connie G. Hendricksen Trust, Robert Hendricksen, D.D.S., and South Centerville Dental Condominium Association, appeal from a judgment of the trial court declaring, after a bench trial, that plaintiffs-appellees Toni and Charles DiPasquale, D.D.S., are entitled to construct additions to their condominium unit. The DiPasquales have also filed a cross-appeal, challenging the trial court’s failure to provide an evidentiary hearing to determine the specific amount of costs and attorney fees awarded as discovery sanctions against…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Becker v. Direct Energy, LPOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Woods v. SharkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Wells Fargo v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Sollenberger v. SollenbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  5. Ogle v. Hocking Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API