Legal Opinion

Autry Petroleum Co. v. BP Products North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 26, 2009No. 08-11607UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Autry Petroleum Company and McDonald Oil Company, independent Georgia corporations, brought this diversity action on behalf of themselves and other intermediate distributors (“Jobbers”) of products of Defendant-Ap-pellee BP Products of North America, Inc. (“BP”), alleging that BP failed to set in good faith the price it charged Jobbers for BP products. BP moved for — and was granted — summary judgment: the district court concluded that Jobbers failed to create a genuine issue of material fact that BP’s pricing acts breached the uniform Branded Jobber Contract (the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Martin v. Brevard County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. ConSeal International Incorporated v. Neogen CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
  3. Stephenson Oil Co. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API