Legal Opinion

Baugh v. Woodard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1982No. 8110SC558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

“A Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is indeed converted to a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment when matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court.” Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 205, 254 S.E. 2d 611, 627 (1979); G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b). In the present case, the court considered live testimony, and, hence, its ruling must be reviewed as if it were a ruling on a motion for summary judgment. See Roach v. City of Lenoir, 44 N.C. App. 608, 261 S.E. 2d 299 (1980). “Summary judgment may be granted . . . where only a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Frederick Robert Paine v. Ben L. Baker, Supervisor of Records, and the North Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. Goble v. BoundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. KeithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. King v. Cape Fear Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Hensley v. Ray's Motor Co. of Forest City, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Hoepner v. Wachovia Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API