Purcell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Cantrell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.
This matter comes here by case-made. Both parties find fault with the document as being a case-made, the plaintiff in error insisting that a transcript was all it could get, and its evidence is not legally here, and therefore it should be entitled to a new trial. The defendant in error is complaining of certain things not being brought forward in the transcript, and making a point on its not being a case-made. However, an inspection of the document shows that both sides agreed to it, and there were no objections whatever, and that waiver of time and place of settling was had. The judge who…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harper v. Rutland Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Pennsylvania Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Brady v. SampsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Purcell Wholesale Grocery v. CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Biser v. BiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Ogilvie v. First Nat. Bank in EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937