Harper v. Rutland Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Custer County; Thos. A. "Edwards, Judge. Action by the Rutland Savings Bank against Charles Harper and another on promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiff. Petition by defendants for vacation of judgment for fraud. Demurrer to defendants’ evidence sustained, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtPitohford, J.
On the 29th day of November, 1915, the Rutland Savings Bank commenced an action against the plaintiffs in error, Charles and Julia Harper, in the district court of Custer county, upon certain promissory notes executed by the plaintiffs in error in favor of the defendant in error. The parties hereafter will be referred to as they appeared in the district court in the first instance.
The defendants were duly served with process, appeared, and filed a demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. The demurrer-was overruled and defendants given 15 days in which to answer. The defendants failed to plead…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gruble v. RyusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Planters Mutual Insurance Association v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Bilby v. CathcartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Utilities Insurance v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Barfield Petroleum Co. v. Pickering Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Axelrod v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.