Legal Opinion

Biser v. Biser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1936No. 26213PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This ease presents error from the district court of Le Elore county, Okla. The parties will be referred to as they appeared below, that is, the plaintiff in error will be referred to as plaintiff and the defendant in error will be referred to as defendant.

In view of the disposition we will make of this case, it will be unnecessary to make a complete statement of the facts.

It appears that on June 17, 1930, the plaintiff obtained herein a decree of divorce from the defendant. The decree, among other things, provided for a division of the property owned by the parties. At the time the aforesaid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Allred v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Griggs v. Reeser Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Hill v. McCleerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. DeWees v. CedarbaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Sawyer v. SawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Long v. McMahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Hibbard v. HibbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API