Romero v. Pueblo of Sandia/Sandia Casino
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, J.
{1} This case requires us to clarify the circumstances under which a plaintiff is entitled to join a defendant’s liability insurer as a party to a lawsuit. Plaintiffs Evangeline Trujillo Romero and Jeff Romero appeal the dismissal of Defendant Cigna Property and Casualty (Cigna) from their personal injury action against the Pueblo of Sandia and Sandia Casino (the Casino). Plaintiffs argue that under the three-part test reiterated in Raskob v. Sanchez, 1998-NMSC-045, ¶ 3,126 N.M. 394, 970 P.2d 580, they are entitled to join Cigna, the liability insurer for the Casino. For the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Govich v. North American Systems, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Trujillo v. SerranoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Jaritas Live Stock Co. v. SpriggsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Raskob v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santa Fe Pacific Trust, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Hoffman v. Sandia Resort and CasinoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- N.M. Dep't of Health v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
- HSD v. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kalantari v. Spirit Mountain Gaming, Inc.Grand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004