Legal Opinion

Raskob v. Sanchez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1998No. 24476PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKINNON, Justice.

{1} Plaintiff-Appellant Elizabeth Raskob sued Defendant Gabriel Sanchez for injuries sustained in an automobile collision in 1992, joining Allstate Insurance Company, his liability insurer, as a defendant. The trial court dismissed Allstate as an improper party to the lawsuit. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that she has a direct claim against the defendant’s insurer under New Mexico’s Mandatory Financial Responsibility Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 66-5-201 to -239 (1978, as amended through 1991, prior to 1998 amendments) and our decision in England v. New Mexico State Highway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breeden v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Anchor Equities, Ltd. v. Pacific Coast AmericanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. England Ex Rel. Shipman v. New Mexico State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Allstate Insurance v. JensenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America v. A-Quality Auto SalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  4. Martinez Ex Rel. Stransky v. ReidNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Gallegos v. Nevada General InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API