Legal Opinion

McCall v. Inter Harbor Navigation Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action to recover for a personal injury claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff while he was employed by the Inter Harbor Navigation Company and serving on the Admiral Farragut, a vessel engaged in coastwise trade and plying between Portland, Oregon, and San Diego, California. He served continuously on this vessel, first as an ordinary seaman, later as an able seaman, and finally as a quartermaster, from October 12, 1931, to July 30, 1932, when he terminated his employment.

On September 8, 1932, or 40 days after lie had ceased working, the plaintiff became ill and consulted a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Beadle v. SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Vilter Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Rey v. Colonial Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Ankeny v. LieuallenOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Stout v. Madden & WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Irwin v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API