Legal Opinion
The Arizona v. Anelich
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 27, 1936No. 667PublishedCited by 203 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
In this case certiorari was granted because of the importance of the question, to review a determination of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington, 183 Wash. 467 ; 49 P. (2d) 3, that assumption of risk is not a defense to an action brought under the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U. S. C. § 688, to recover damages for the injury and death of a seaman caused by a defective appliance, a part of the equipment of a fishing vessel on which he was employed.
The injury occurred at sea, when respondent’s intestate was engaged in hauling in, with a power winch, the purse line of a fishing net.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.