Legal Opinion
Stout v. Madden & Williams
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1956PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
This is an action by Lansing Stout against John B. Madden, dba Jolly John’s, and Eddie Williams, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in being run down and injured by an automobile operated by defendant Williams and purchased by Williams from defendant Madden. From an order of the trial court sustaining a motion for an involuntary nonsuit as to defendant Madden, plaintiff brings this appeal.
A guardian ad litem was appointed for defendant Williams, a minor, but no appearance was made by him or on his behalf. He was present during the trial, but not represented by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Kuhns v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., Western Oper.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- McNealy v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.