Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey Club

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 3, 1931PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

Opinion — Reflecting the Views of the

Various Judges on the Several Questions Presented.

The commonwealth instituted an action in equity against the Kentucky Jockey Club, Latonia Jockey Club, and Churchill Downs, to inquire into the character of their past transactions, and to regulate the scope of their future conduct. The petition presented a threefold aspect, asking relief of an equitable character, embracing also an action in the nature of a quo warranto to forfeit the charters and franchises of the several corporations and seeking incidentally to recover a large sum of money as damages.

The…

2Cases cited166 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Multnomah County Fair Ass'n v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Tweel v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Oneida County Fair Board v. SmylieIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API