Legal Opinion

United States v. Fulkerson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided May 18, 1896No. 820PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLBORN, District Judge.

This is a prosecution for violation of section 3894 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (1 Supp. Rev. St. § 803). Defendants have demurred to the indictment on the grounds hereinafter noticed. There are two counts in the indictment. The first count’ charges that the defendants “did knowingly deposit, and cause to be deposited,” in the post office at Los Angeles, Gal., a certain pamphlet, and other instruments, concerning a lottery then and there conducted by a corporation called “United Indemnity Company,” and sets forth in full copies of said pamphlet and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Ballock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. United States v. ClarkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Ak-Sar-Ben Exposition Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Hathorn v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Quatsoe v. EgglestonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Gray v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API