Legal Opinion

Brookshire Grocery Co. v. Bomer

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided October 2, 1997No. 03-97-00055-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDD, Justice.

Appellant Brookshire Grocery Company (“Brookshire”) challenges a judgment rendered in favor of appellee Elton Bomer, successor to J. Robert Hunter, as Permanent Receiver of Texas Employers Insurance Association (“Receiver”). After a bench trial, the trial court found that Brookshire and Texas Employers Insurance Association (“TELA”) had entered into a void side agreement to obtain an indirect and illegal dividend to a workers’ compensation policy and an employers’ liability insurance policy entered into in 1986 (collectively the “1986 Policy”). After finding that the original…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. English Freight Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Tankersley v. DurishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Associated Employers Lloyds v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Glenn H. McCarthy, Inc. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Wayne Duddlesten, Inc. v. Highland Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. ExxonMobil Corp. v. Kirkendall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. National Union Fire Insurance v. LSB Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Photocircuits Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API