Legal Opinion

Tankersley v. Durish

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 7, 1993No. 3-92-292-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

This appeal involves the determination of the validity of workers’ compensation insurance policies. Luther Frank Tankersley appeals from a district court order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, Stephen S. Durish, ancillary receiver for Transit Casualty Company; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; and Alexander & Alexander, Inc. and Alexander & Alexander of Texas, Inc. (collectively “A & A”). We will affirm the judgment of the district court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. The Insurance Policies

In 1983 and 1984, Wal-Mart…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Patrick v. Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  3. City of Dallas v. Albert, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Alameda Corp. v. Transamerican Natural Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. Yarbrough's Dirt Pit, Inc. v. Turner, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API