Barr v. Matteo
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
,Mr. Justice Brennan,
dissenting.
I think it is demonstrable that the solution of Mr. Justice Harlan’s opinion to the question whether an absolute privilege should be allowed in these cases is not justified by the considerations offered to support it, and unnecessarily deprives the individual citizen of all redress against malicious defamation. Surely the opinion must recognize the existence of the deep-rooted policy of the common law generally to provide redress against defamation. But the opinion in sweeping terms extinguishes that remedy, if the defamation is committed by a federal official,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Booth v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- William G. Barr v. Linda A. Matteo, Willaim G. Barr v. John J. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Kenneth T. Lyons v. W. E. Howard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958