William G. Barr v. Linda A. Matteo, Willaim G. Barr v. John J. Madigan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The case is before us a second time. In our earlier decision, Barr v. Matteo, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 319, 244 F.2d 767, where the facts are set forth more fully, we held that appellant, defendant in the District Court, could not successfully defend the libel suit of appellees, plaintiffs, on the basis of an absolute privilege. For reasons stated by the majority we did not pass upon the District Court’s rejection of appellant’s claim of a qualified privilege. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and remanded the case to us “with directions to pass upon petitioner’s claim of a qualified privilege.”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Williams v. McManusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
- Merchants' Ins. Co. of Newark v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Blake v. TrainerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- William G. Barr v. Linda A. Matteo, William G. Barr v. John J. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Coleman v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- Foretich v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.