Legal Opinion

White v. Hamilton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1931No. Civil No. 2994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The pleadings in this ease present for determination the question as to which, the plaintiffs or defendants, are the trustees of Palm Chapter No. 3, Order of Eastern Star of Arizona, and entitled to its property, the use of its name, and the exercise of its functions.

The plaintiffs, consisting of Nola Hamilton et ah, in their complaint, defendants, consisting of Noble E. White et al., in their answer and cross-complaint, and plaintiffs in their answer to cross-complaint, agree that Palm Chapter No. 3 obtained its charter from the Grand Chapter, Order of Eastern Star of Arizona. So the issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Watson v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Stock Growers Finance Corp. v. HildrethArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Yuma v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. BearArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Headley v. HeadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hamilton v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API