Legal Opinion

City of Yuma v. English

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1924No. Civil No. 2163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

— This action is by English & Pierce, to recover from the city of Yuma, a municipal corporation, the price of a city hall, which they allege in their complaint was “sold and delivered to the defendant” at its “special instance and request,” and alleged to have been “reasonably worth $68,000,” an amount which the defendant “promised to pay,” but failed to do, with the exception of $36,631.

The complaint is a .detail from the ancient common counts, alleging sale and delivery at special instance and request of the buyer and failure to pay. It assumes that a municipal corporation may buy a city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Village of OgalallaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Board of Supervisors v. ArrighiMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Wrought Iron Bridge Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. HamiltonArizona Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API